刘惠, 赵抒. 生存理由研究综述[J]. 电子科技大学学报社科版, 2017, 19(3): 7-10. DOI: 10.14071/j.1008-8105(2017)03-0007-04
引用本文: 刘惠, 赵抒. 生存理由研究综述[J]. 电子科技大学学报社科版, 2017, 19(3): 7-10. DOI: 10.14071/j.1008-8105(2017)03-0007-04
LIU Hui, ZHAO Shu. Review of Reasons for Living[J]. Journal of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China(SOCIAL SCIENCES EDITION), 2017, 19(3): 7-10. DOI: 10.14071/j.1008-8105(2017)03-0007-04
Citation: LIU Hui, ZHAO Shu. Review of Reasons for Living[J]. Journal of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China(SOCIAL SCIENCES EDITION), 2017, 19(3): 7-10. DOI: 10.14071/j.1008-8105(2017)03-0007-04

生存理由研究综述

Review of Reasons for Living

  • 摘要: 上世纪80年代学者们开始了对生存理由的研究。作为自杀的保护性因素之一,生存理由是个体在遇到挫折时的积极认知,能够避免个体出现自杀意念或行为。Linehan最早进行了相关研究,在前人研究的基础上基于认知行为理论,编制了相应的评估工具——生存理由量表(RFL),现已被广泛应用于各文化背景下的危机干预研究中。然而,国内目前对生存理由的研究较为缺乏。为此,特别梳理了生存理由等相关研究,回顾了近年来的研究进展,包括研究方法与工具、相关研究与应用、影响因素等,对今后的研究方向有了进一步的思考。

     

    Abstract: In the 1980s, scholars began to study reasons of living. As one of the protective factors of suicide, reasons of living is individual's survival positive cognition to avoid the suicidal ideation or behavior when they face setbacks. Linehan first carried out the relevant research. On the basis of predecessors' research, he developed the corresponding assessment tool — The Inventory of Reasons for Living (RFL) which is based on the cognitive behavior theory. And now it is widely used in crisis intervention researches of various cultural backgrounds. However, there is a lack of research on the reasons for living in China. Based on combing the related researches, this paper reviewed the research progress in recent years, including: methods and tools, related researches and application, influence factors, and so on, which proposes the future research direction.

     

/

返回文章
返回