刘文涛. AI换脸技术的应用风险及法律规制[J]. 电子科技大学学报(社科版), 2024, 26(2): 1-10.. DOI: 10.14071/j.1008-8105(2023)-4006
引用本文: 刘文涛. AI换脸技术的应用风险及法律规制[J]. 电子科技大学学报(社科版), 2024, 26(2): 1-10.. DOI: 10.14071/j.1008-8105(2023)-4006
LIU Wen-tao. Application Risk and Legal Regulation of AI Face-Changing Technology[J]. Journal of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China(SOCIAL SCIENCES EDITION). DOI: 10.14071/j.1008-8105(2023)-4006
Citation: LIU Wen-tao. Application Risk and Legal Regulation of AI Face-Changing Technology[J]. Journal of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China(SOCIAL SCIENCES EDITION). DOI: 10.14071/j.1008-8105(2023)-4006

AI换脸技术的应用风险及法律规制

Application Risk and Legal Regulation of AI Face-Changing Technology

  • 摘要: AI换脸源于深度伪造技术,涉及大量人脸信息,兼具数据属性。AI换脸的逼真度高、操作门槛低,获得了广泛的应用。但是该技术的滥用导致了较高的著作权、人格权等私权利侵犯风险、信息安全风险和犯罪防控风险。目前域外对AI换脸技术的法律规制主要存在分散式立法规制和统一立法规制两种模式。我国尚未建立系统化的规制体系,今后应当从以下方面进行完善:一是明确以区分应用场景前提下的合理使用为基本规制原则;二是构建事前、事中规制体系,明确研发者的技术伦理和制作者的标识义务、声明义务,保障信息主体的知情权和同意权,加强传播平台的内容审查义务;三是构建以数据、算法为核心的监管体制;四是严格民事法律责任追究,加大刑法制裁力度。

     

    Abstract: AI face-changing originates from deep forgery technology, which involves a large amount of face information and data attributes. AI face-changing has been widely used due to its high fidelity and low operating threshold. However, the abuse of this technology leads to higher risk of infringement of private rights such as copyright and personality right, information security risk and crime prevention and control risk. At present, the legal regulation of AI face-changing technology outside China mainly exists two modes: decentralized legislative regulation and unified legislative regulation. China has not yet established a systematic regulation system, which should be improved from the following aspects in the future. First, to clear that the basic regulation principle is reasonable under the premise of distinguishing application scenarios. Second, a preevent and in-event regulation system is to be established, to clarify the technical ethics of developers and the labeling and declaration obligations of producers, to ensure the right to know and consent of information subjects, and to strengthen the content review obligations of communication platforms. Third, to construct the regulatory system of data and algorithm as the core.Fourth, to strictly investigate civil legal liability and intensify criminal sanctions.

     

/

返回文章
返回