陈书涵, 杨广青, 杜亚飞. 企业扶贫行为中的高管动机:“政治责任”还是“情感共情”——兼论管理自主权的调节作用[J]. 电子科技大学学报社科版, 2023, 25(3): 101-112. DOI: 10.14071/j.1008-8105(2023)-5005
引用本文: 陈书涵, 杨广青, 杜亚飞. 企业扶贫行为中的高管动机:“政治责任”还是“情感共情”——兼论管理自主权的调节作用[J]. 电子科技大学学报社科版, 2023, 25(3): 101-112. DOI: 10.14071/j.1008-8105(2023)-5005
CHEN Shu-han, YANG Guang-qing, DU Ya-fei. Top Management’s Motivation in Poverty Alleviation: Political Responsibility or Emotional Empathy——On the Regulatory Effect of Managerial Discretion[J]. Journal of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China(SOCIAL SCIENCES EDITION), 2023, 25(3): 101-112. DOI: 10.14071/j.1008-8105(2023)-5005
Citation: CHEN Shu-han, YANG Guang-qing, DU Ya-fei. Top Management’s Motivation in Poverty Alleviation: Political Responsibility or Emotional Empathy——On the Regulatory Effect of Managerial Discretion[J]. Journal of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China(SOCIAL SCIENCES EDITION), 2023, 25(3): 101-112. DOI: 10.14071/j.1008-8105(2023)-5005

企业扶贫行为中的高管动机:“政治责任”还是“情感共情”兼论管理自主权的调节作用

Top Management’s Motivation in Poverty Alleviation: Political Responsibility or Emotional EmpathyOn the Regulatory Effect of Managerial Discretion

  • 摘要:
    目的/意义在推进脱贫攻坚与乡村振兴有机衔接过程中,提高企业扶贫积极性是推进产业扶贫和落实产业兴旺的关键,是接续推进乡村振兴政策设计的重要抓手。
    设计/方法利用沪深A股上市企业2016~2019年精准扶贫数据,深入“过程黑箱”,揭示企业高管团队扶贫决策动机。
    结论/发现(1)高管扶贫决策存在明显“政治责任”和“情感共情”动机,管理自主权的调节作用在政治和情感动机中存在显著差异。(2)当企业高管的扶贫决策源于“政治责任”动机时,若企业内部财务冗余丰富、盈利能力较强,会促使高管加大扶贫投入;而外部制度环境则不影响高管“政治责任”动机和企业扶贫投入的关系。(3)当企业高管的扶贫决策源于“情感共情”动机时,管理自主权调节作用无效,即高管纯粹因内心情感而产生的扶贫意愿不易被内部资源和外部制度环境等权变因素动摇。

     

    Abstract: Purpose/Significance In the process of promoting poverty alleviation and rural revitalization, improving enthusiasm of enterprises for poverty alleviation is key to promote industrial poverty alleviation and implement industrial prosperity, as well as make policies for promoting rural revitalization. Design/Methodology Using the data from listed companies engaging in poverty alleviation activities between 2016 and 2019, the paper examines motives of business leaders whose firms participating in poverty alleviation by uncovering the black box of top management team’s decision-making process. Conclusions/Findings (1) Top executives are motivated by both political responsibility and emotional empathy to engage in poverty alleviation activities. (2) When top executives are motivated by political responsibility, they are more likely to engage in poverty alleviation when internal resources are abundant. When firm profitability is high, while external institutional environment does not affect the relationship between executives’ political responsibility motivation and corporate poverty alleviation investment. (3) When top executives are motivated by emotional empathy, managerial discretion has no moderating effects, since purely intrinsic motivation that generates from emotion is less volatile to contingency factors including internal resources and external institutional environment.

     

/

返回文章
返回