• Overview of Chinese core journals
  • Chinese Science Citation Database(CSCD)
  • Chinese Scientific and Technological Paper and Citation Database (CSTPCD)
  • China National Knowledge Infrastructure(CNKI)
  • Chinese Science Abstracts Database(CSAD)
  • JST China
  • SCOPUS
LIU Yang, FAN Sheng-yue, WANG He. Integrated Research on Performance Evaluation Model of Ecological Governance Policy[J]. Journal of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China(SOCIAL SCIENCES EDITION), 2018, 20(6): 24-32. DOI: 10.14071/j.1008-8105(2018)-1058
Citation: LIU Yang, FAN Sheng-yue, WANG He. Integrated Research on Performance Evaluation Model of Ecological Governance Policy[J]. Journal of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China(SOCIAL SCIENCES EDITION), 2018, 20(6): 24-32. DOI: 10.14071/j.1008-8105(2018)-1058

Integrated Research on Performance Evaluation Model of Ecological Governance Policy

More Information
  • Received Date: July 04, 2017
  • Available Online: August 29, 2018
  • With the large-scale implementation of ecological civilization construction strategy and ecological restoration project, the performance evaluation of ecological policy attracts more and more concerns and research. The integration of public value performance evaluation method and cost construction performance evaluation method gives full play to their respective advantages and makes remedies to their deficiencies, which is of great importance to ecological restoration policy performance evaluation. The authors construct unified model of public value performance evaluation method and transaction cost performance evaluation method after analyzing their common theoretical foundation and respective performance evaluation models. It can provide comparison and correction to these two kinds of performance which may extend the time series of public value performance value, offer methods to transform their inner structures and forecast the variation of projects’ public value. This paper takes the Grassland Grazing Prohibition Policy conducted in Siziwang Banner - a typical area of Inner Mongolia as an example to verify the feasibility of the integrated method.
  • 1] 王立群, 乔娜, 康瑞斌. 京津风沙源治理工程生态影响及评估研究进展和展望[J]. 林业经济, 2013(6)
    2] 王丹丹, 吴普特, 赵西宁. 黄土高原退耕还林(草)效益评价研究进展[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2010, 25(3): 223-228
    环境保护部. 中华人民共和国国家环境保护标准环境影响评价技术导则 生态影响:环境影响评价技术导则生态影响[M]. 北京: 中国环境科学出版社, 2011.
    国家林业局. 京津风沙源治理工程社会经济效益监测与评价指标[S]. 北京: 中华人民共和国林业行业标准LY/T 1758-2008.
    5] 高新中, 姚继广, 董宽虎, 等. 山西省京津风沙源治理工程草地生态系统服务价值评估[J]. 草原与草坪, 2010, 30(5): 30-35
    6] 郭磊, 陈建成, 王顺彦. 正蓝旗京津风沙源治理工程综合效益评价[J]. 经济研究参考, 2006(30): 39-44
    7] 胡俊, 叶海英, 王冬梅, 等. 北京市京津风沙源治理工程生态与经济效益研究与评价[J]. 北京农学院学报, 2012, 27(4): 38-42
    8] 赖亚飞, 朱清科, 张宇清, 等. 吴旗县退耕还林生态效益价值评估[J]. 水土保持学报, 2006, 20(3): 83-87
    9] 钱贵霞, 郭建军. 京津风沙源治理工程及生态经济影响解析[J]. 农业经济问题, 2007(10): 54-57
    10] 孙新章, 谢高地, 甄霖. 泾河流域退耕还林(草)综合效益与生态补偿趋向—以宁夏回族自治区固原市原州区为例[J]. 资源科学, 2007, 29(2): 194-200
    11] 樊胜岳. 基于公共价值的生态建设政策绩效评价研究[J]. 行政论坛, 2013(4): 110-116
    12] 樊胜岳, 陈玉玲, 徐均. 基于公共价值的生态建设政策绩效评价及比较[J]. 公共管理学报, 2013(2): 110-116
    13] 樊胜岳, 陈玉玲, 杨建东. 生态建设项目的公共价值绩效及其内部结构—以河北省赤城县为例[J]. 电子科技大学学报(社会科学版), 2014(6): 1-7
    14] 樊胜岳, 聂莹, 郑秋亚. 我国民族地区生态建设项目的公共价值绩效评价—以内蒙古奈曼旗为例[J]. 中央民族大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2015(5): 86-93
    15] 聂莹, 樊胜岳. 西部民族地区生态治理政策公共价值分析与绩效评价—以内蒙古翁牛特旗为例[J]. 中央民族大学学报:哲学社会科学版, 2017(6): 110-119
    16] 樊胜岳, 兰健, 徐均, 等. 生态建设政策交易成本及其结构的比较[J]. 冰川冻土, 2013, 35(5): 1283-1291
    17] 樊胜岳, 乌日嘎, 赵丹华, 等. 沙漠化地区生态建设政策执行过程中的交易成本分析[J]. 干旱区地理, 2012, 35(5): 815-821
    18] 樊胜岳, 杨建东, 陈玉玲. 生态治理项目的交易成本及其绩效评价[J]. 电子科技大学学报(社科版), 2014(6): 8-15
    19] 刘洋, 樊胜岳. 以成本结构分析为基础的生态治理政策绩效评价[J]. 干旱区地理(汉文版), 2017(6): 1298-1306
    詹姆斯•M.布坎南, 戈登•图洛克. 同意的计算[M]. 上海: 上海人民出版社, 2014.
    詹姆斯•E.阿尔特, 肯尼思•A.谢泼斯. 实证政治经济学[M]. 上海: 上海人民出版社, 2009.
    丹尼斯•C.缪勒. 公共选择理论[M]. 北京: 中国社会科学出版社, 2010.
    23] 黄新华, 李凯. 公共选择理论与交易成本政治学的比较分析[J]. 财经问题研究, 2011(1): 3-9
    NORTH D C. Structure and Change in Economic History[M]. [S.l.]: Norton, 1981.
    25] NORTH D C. A Transaction Cost Theory of Politics[J]. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 1990, 2(4): 355-367
    阿维纳什•K•迪克西特, DIXIT AK. 经济政策的制定[M]. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2004.
    27] 黄新华. 政治交易的经济分析—当代西方交易成本政治学述评[J]. 厦门大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2009(5): 5-13
    28] 马骏. 交易费用政治学:现状与前景[J]. 经济研究, 2003(1): 80-86
    29] 包国宪, 王学军. 以公共价值为基础的政府绩效治理—源起、架构与研究问题[J]. 公共管理学报, 2012, 9(2): 89-97
    30] 王学军, 张弘. 公共价值的研究路径与前沿问题[J]. 公共管理学报, 2013, 10(2): 126-136
    包国宪, 道格拉斯•摩根. 政府绩效管理学: 以公共价值为基础的政府绩效治理理论与方法[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2015.
    32] COASE R H. The Nature of the Firm[J]. Economica, 1937, 4(16): 386-405
    33] COASE R H. The Problem of Social Cost[J]. Journal of Law & Economics, 1960, 3(4): 1-44
    34] ALLEN D W. What Are Transaction Costs[J]. Research in Law & Economics, 1991, 14: 1-18
    35] BARZEL Y. Transaction Costs: Are They Just Costs?[J]. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 1985, 141(1): 4-16
    36] CHEUNG S N S. Transaction Costs, Risk Aversion, and the Choice of Contractual Arrangements[J]. Uncertainty in Economics, 1969, 12(1): 23-42
    37] DAHLMAN C J. The Problem of Externality[J]. Journal of Law & Economics, 1979, 22(1): 141-162
    NORTH D C. Institutions,institucional change and economic performance[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990: 151-155.
    39] WILLIAMSON O E. The Economics of Organization: The Transaction Cost Approach[J]. American Journal of Sociology, 1981, 87(3): 548-577
    40] COGGAN A, WHITTEN S M, BENNETT J. Influences of transaction costs in environmental policy[J]. Ecological Economics, 2010, 69(9): 1777-1784
    41] COLBY B G. Transactions Costs and Efficiency in Western Water Allocation[J]. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1990, 72(5): 1184-1192
    42] GALLEMORE C, GREGORIO M D, MOELIONO M, et al. Transaction costs, power, and multi-level forest governance in Indonesia [J]. Ecological Economics, 2015, 114: 168-179
    43] MCCANN L, EASTER K W. Transaction Costs of Policies to Reduce Agricultural Phosphorous Pollution in the Minnesota River[J]. Land Economics, 1999, 75(3): 402-414
    44] SOLOMON B D. New directions in emissions trading: the potential contribution of new institutional economics[J]. Ecological Economics, 1999, 30(3): 371-387
    李小云. 生态补偿机制: 市场与政府的作用[M]. 北京: 社会科学文献出版社, 2007.
    46] 沈满洪. 论水权交易与交易成本[J]. 人民黄河, 2004, 26(7): 19-22
    杨小凯. 新兴古典经济学和超边际分析[M]. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2000.
    徐建华. 计量地理学[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2014.

Catalog

    Article views (9444) PDF downloads (67) Cited by()

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return