Data Quality Management in Smart Governance: Core Elements, Mechanism Construction, and Support Guarantee

QIN Zhi-mei; ZHANG Yao-yao; LI Wei-wei; YANG Yi-fan; WANG Bin; LI Yu-chen

doi:10.14071/j.1008-8105(2024)-5003

Journal of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China(SOCIAL SCIENCES EDITION) > 2024 > 26(4): 45-56. > DOI: 10.14071/j.1008-8105(2024)-5003

QIN Zhi-mei, ZHANG Yao-yao, LI Wei-wei, YANG Yi-fan, WANG Bin, LI Yu-chen. Data Quality Management in Smart Governance: Core Elements, Mechanism Construction, and Support Guarantee[J]. Journal of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China(SOCIAL SCIENCES EDITION), 2024, 26(4): 45-56. DOI: 10.14071/j.1008-8105(2024)-5003

Citation:

PDF (1375 KB)

Data Quality Management in Smart Governance: Core Elements, Mechanism Construction, and Support Guarantee

1.
Smart Chengdu Research Institute Co., Ltd.　Chengdu　610000　China
2.
Southwest Jiaotong University　Chengdu　610000　China
3.
Chengdu Data Group Co., Ltd.　Chengdu　610000　China

More Information

Received Date: December 24, 2023
Available Online: May 05, 2024

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

This paper is to explore the path of data quality management in smart governance, promote the improvement of data quality, and highlight the effectiveness of smart governance. It builds an analytical framework for data quality management in smart governance from three dimensions: core elements, mechanism construction, and support guarantee,with infectious disease monitoring and early warning management as a case study. Data quality is one of the important factors affecting the effectiveness of smart governance. The source and stakeholders of data, as well as the data flow process, are the core elements of data quality management in smart governance. Classic methods for quality improvement and process improvement can be effectively applied to smart governance. Policy guarantees, technological tools, and mechanism iterations are important guarantees for the long-term implementation of data quality management. The phased nature of smart governance and the demand for governance effectiveness determine the requirements for data quality management. Data quality management can achieve the improvement of smart governance efficiency, high-quality development of the data element market, and further promote the practical implementation of data quality management concepts and methods in all aspects of the data cycle.
- smart governance,
- data quality management,
- mechanism construction

FullText(HTML)

References (53)

References

[1]	张会平, 马太平, 孙立爽. 政府数据赋能数字经济升级: 授权运营, 隐私计算与场景重构[J]. 情报杂志, 2022, 41(4): 166-172.
[2]	谭九生, 李猛. 智慧治理视域下跨部门政府信息资源共享的阻碍与纾解[J]. 行政与法, 2021, 276(8): 1-8. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-8207.2021.08.001
[3]	陈水生. 迈向数字时代的城市智慧治理: 内在理路与转型路径[J]. 上海行政学院学报, 2021, 22(5): 48-57. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-3176.2021.05.005
[4]	宋君, 沙巨山. 数字治理到智慧治理的演进逻辑、风险管控与价值实现[J]. 领导科学, 2022(10): 120-123.
[5]	顾丽梅, 李欢欢, 张扬. 城市数字化转型的挑战与优化路径研究——以上海市为例[J]. 西安交通大学学报(社会科学版). 2022, 42(03): 41-50.
[6]	TALEB I, SERHANI M A, BOUHADDIOUI C, et al. Big data quality framework: a holistic approach to continuous quality management[J]. Journal of Big Data, 2021, 8(76): 5-10
[7]	XUE B. A mathematical framework for data quality management in enterprise systems[J]. Informs Journal on Computing, 2011, 24(4): 648-664.
[8]	钱力, 刘细文, 张智雄, 等. 科技情报智慧数据: 方法、体系与应用[J/OL]. 情报理论与实践: 1-11[2023-09-28]. http://kns.cnki.net.era.lib.swjtu.edu.cn:80/kcms/detail/11.1762.G3.20230921.1840.004.html.
[9]	常志军, 张智雄, 钱力, 等. 科技情报智慧数据治理技术体系研究与应用实践[J/OL]. 情报理论与实践: 1-11[2023-09-28]. http://kns.cnki.net.era.lib.swjtu.edu.cn:80/kcms/detail/11.1762.G3.20230921.1921.006.html.
[10]	张亨明, 章皓月. 城市治理智慧化的理论分析与实践探索[J]. 求索, 2021(6): 156-164. doi: 10.16059/j.cnki.cn43-1008/c.2021.06.014
[11]	杨嵘均. 城乡基层智慧治理体系构建的基本范式、制约因素与创新路径[J]. 河海大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2021, 23(4): 60-67+107.
[12]	秦之湄, 张会平, 王斌, 等. 智慧治理中的数据质量管理困境及对策研究[J/OL]. 大数据: 1-22[2023-12-16]. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/10.1321.G2.20231213.1010.004.html.
[13]	MARYAM GHASEMAGHAEI, GORAN CALIC. Can big data improve firm decision quality? The role of data quality and data diagnosticity[J]. Decision Support Systems, 2019, 120: 38-49. doi: 10.1016/j.dss.2019.03.008
[14]	刘琼, 刘桂锋, 聂云贝. 面向科研全过程的科学数据质量控制主体划分及责任界定研究[J]. 情报探索, 2023(4): 17-23.
[15]	王鸿鹭, 蒋炜, 魏来, 等. 基于物联网的产品全生命周期质量管理的模式创新与展望[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2021, 41(2): 475-482. doi: 10.12011/SETP2020-1118
[16]	祝凌瑶, 周丽, 柳虎威. 数字经济时代政府数据质量管理的演化博弈分析[J]. 运筹与管理, 2022, 31(9): 21-27.
[17]	徐绪堪, 李一铭, 庞庆华. 数字经济下政府开放数据共享的演化博弈分析[J]. 情报杂志, 2020, 39(12): 119-125+87. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-1965.2020.12.018
[18]	张会平, 顾勤. 政府数据流动: 方式、实践困境与协同治理[J]. 治理研究, 2022, 38(3): 59-69+126. doi: 10.15944/j.cnki.33-1010/d.2022.03.011
[19]	张会平, 代晨航. 行业监管中企业数据向政府共享的政策逻辑与路径创新[J]. 科技管理研究, 2023, 43(6): 196-202.
[20]	黄倩倩, 赵正, 刘钊因. 数据流通交易场景下数据质量综合管理体系与技术框架研究[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2022, 6(1): 22-34.
[21]	毛有丰, 余芳东, 李一辰. 新时代统计监督的概念内涵和特征研究[J]. 统计研究, 2022, 39(7): 3-11.
[22]	冯绍伍, 江峰, 杨智曾. 大数据思维下实现精准税务监管的思考与探索[J]. 税务研究, 2022(11): 83-88.
[23]	张凯. 金融数据治理的突出困境与创新策略[J]. 西南金融, 2021(9): 15-27.
[24]	刘利群, 刘晓燕, 刘阳, 等. 改善医保数据质量的标准化流程建设: 2013—2015年河南省某县新型农村合作医疗数据质量的评价和改进[J]. 疾病监测, 2021, 36(3): 261-269.
[25]	冯雨晴, 谭雅文. 央行征信系统数据质量管理问题探讨[J]. 征信, 2022, 40(10): 35-38.
[26]	陈雅静, 钱梦岑, 张馨予, 等. 上海市按疾病诊断相关分组付费改革中的病案收集及数据质控[J]. 中国卫生资源, 2022, 25(1): 24-27. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-953X.2022.01.006
[27]	安小米, 韩新伊, 陈桂红, 等. 政府数据利用能力保障要素研究: 以北京市为例[J]. 情报资料工作, 2023, 44(5): 50-60.
[28]	莫祖英, 侯征, 贺雅文. 管理者视角下政府开放数据质量影响因素扎根研究[J]. 图书馆学研究, 2021(13): 18-26.
[29]	孙嘉睿, 安小米. 开放政府数据质量评估指标体系研究[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2023, 46(6): 94-100+78.
[30]	FERNANDO GUALO, MOISÉS RODRIGUEZ, JAVIER VERDUGO. et al. Data quality certification using ISO/IEC 25012: industrial experiences[J]. Journal of Systems and Software, 2021, 176: 110938 doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2021.110938
[31]	WANG R Y, STRONG D M. Beyond accuracy: what data quality means to consumers[J]. Journal of Management Information Systems, 1996, 12: 5-34. doi: 10.1080/07421222.1996.11518099
[32]	WANG R Y, STOREY V C, FIRTH P. A framework for analysis of data quality research[J]. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 1995, 7: 623-640. doi: 10.1109/69.404034
[33]	段尧清, 姜慧, 汤弘昊. 政府开放数据全生命周期: 概念、模型与结构——系统论视角[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2019, 42(5): 35-40+50.
[34]	翟运开, 刘冰琳, 王宇, 等. 数据生命周期视角下医疗健康大数据资产化影响因素研究——基于Fuzzy-DEMATEL-ISM方法的实证分析[J/OL]. 情报杂志: 1-8[2023-12-13]. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/61.1167.g3.20230919.1005.006.html.
[35]	刘晓娟, 孙镘莉. 生命周期视角下科学数据安全分级管理实践与启示[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2023, 46(3): 68-74. doi: 10.16353/j.cnki.1000-7490.2023.03.010
[36]	李晓宁, 张一鸣. 基于PDCA循环的全流程审计质量控制体系构建研究[J]. 西安财经大学学报, 2023, 36(6): 80-93. doi: 10.19331/j.cnki.jxufe.20231020.001
[37]	李祝启, 陆和建. 我国公共文化服务政社合作供给和运营全流程风险控制研究——基于PDCA方法的分析[J]. 图书馆建设, 2022(6): 137-147. doi: 10.19764/j.cnki.tsgjs.20212545
[38]	陈之瑶, 罗军. PDCA模型在科技项目全流程质量管理的应用——以广东省重点领域研发计划项目管理为例[J]. 科技管理研究, 2022, 42(22): 169-176. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7695.2022.22.023
[39]	葛泽钰. 基于PDCA循环的档案数据质量控制探究[J]. 档案与建设, 2023(8): 40-43. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-7098.2023.08.012
[40]	刘春春. 生命科学公共平台质量管理探讨[J]. 实验技术与管理, 2022, 39(2): 267-272. doi: 10.16791/j.cnki.sjg.2022.02.052
[41]	赵宁, 石磊, 徐乐, 等. 开源情报开发利用的精益六西格玛管理[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2021, 44(11): 53-59. doi: 10.16353/j.cnki.1000-7490.2021.11.008
[42]	国际数据管理协会(DAMA国际). DAMA数据管理知识体系指南(第2版)[M]. 北京: 机械工业出版社, 2021.
[43]	张坦, 黄伟, 石勇. ISO 8000(大)数据质量标准及应用[J]. 大数据, 2017, 3(1): 3-11.
[44]	CICHY C, RASS S. An overview of data quality frameworks[J]. IEEE Access, 2019, 7: 24634-24648
[45]	刘正军, 刘雨馨, 王雅晴. DMAIC方法在制造业企业预算考评指标建设中的应用[J]. 湖南社会科学, 2021(5): 85-91.
[46]	刘虎沉, 王鹤鸣, 施华. 智能质量管理: 理论模型、关键技术与研究展望[J/OL]. 中国管理科学: 1-16[2023-09-20]. https://doi-org-s.era.lib.swjtu.edu.cn:443/10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2023.0399.
[47]	祁占勇, 冯啸然. 基于全面质量管理的高质量技能型人才培养体系构建[J]. 现代教育管理, 2023(7): 107-117.
[48]	白献阳, 邝苗苗. 政府数字信息资源质量控制机制研究[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2021, 44(7): 71-78. doi: 10.16353/j.cnki.1000-7490.2021.07.011
[49]	ZHANG R, INDULSKA M, SADIQ S. Discovering data quality problems[J]. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 2019, 61: 575-593. doi: 10.1007/s12599-019-00608-0
[50]	MENG X L. Enhancing (publications on) data quality: deeper data minding and fuller data confession[J]. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A: Statistics in Society, 2021, 184(4): 1161-1175
[51]	EVEN A, SHANKARANARAYANAN G, BERGER P D. Inequality in utility of data and its implications for data management[J]. In Proceedings of the 17th Annual Workshop on Information Technology and Systems, WITS 2007.
[52]	翟运开, 郭瑞芳, 王宇, 等. 数据生命周期视角下的医疗健康大数据质量评价研究[J/OL]. 现代情报: 1-14[2023-12-13]. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/22.1182.G3.20231019.0924.004.html.
[53]	LIU Q, FENG G Z, ZHAO X. et al. Minimizing the data quality problem of information systems: a process-based method[J]. Decision Support Systems, 2020, 137: 113381. doi: 10.1016/j.dss.2020.113381

Cited By

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Article views (1218) PDF downloads (10)

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Data Quality Management in Smart Governance: Core Elements, Mechanism Construction, and Support Guarantee

Abstract

References

Catalog

Export File

Citation

Format

Content