张慧颖; 陈玺光. 研发资本化背景下美加澳R&D核算经验评述[J]. 电子科技大学学报社科版, 2015, 17(3): 51-55. DOI: 10.14071/j.1008-8105(2015)03-0051-05
引用本文: 张慧颖; 陈玺光. 研发资本化背景下美加澳R&D核算经验评述[J]. 电子科技大学学报社科版, 2015, 17(3): 51-55. DOI: 10.14071/j.1008-8105(2015)03-0051-05
ZHANG Hui-ying. A Review of Experience on Measuring R&D in America, Canada and Australia with the Capitalization of Research and Development[J]. Journal of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China(SOCIAL SCIENCES EDITION), 2015, 17(3): 51-55. DOI: 10.14071/j.1008-8105(2015)03-0051-05
Citation: ZHANG Hui-ying. A Review of Experience on Measuring R&D in America, Canada and Australia with the Capitalization of Research and Development[J]. Journal of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China(SOCIAL SCIENCES EDITION), 2015, 17(3): 51-55. DOI: 10.14071/j.1008-8105(2015)03-0051-05

研发资本化背景下美加澳R&D核算经验评述

A Review of Experience on Measuring R&D in America, Canada and Australia with the Capitalization of Research and Development

  • 摘要: 《国民账户体系-2008》(简称SNA08)中对研发资本化的修订, 为各国重新审视研发属性及核算提供了足够的依据。SNA08对研究与开发的界定, 首先揭示了研发的资产属性;其次对美国、加拿大和澳大利亚研发核算统计经验的对比, 包括对研发的认定、对溢出的处理、核算机构以及核算方法, 对尚未实施研发资本化的中国来说, 都具有足够的借鉴意义;最后结合中国统计的情况, 提出了研发核算的建议。

     

    Abstract: The capitalization of research and development expenditures has been revised in《System of National Accounts2008》(SNA08), which provides sufficient basis to reexamine the property and methods of R&D. The definition of R&D which is explained in SNA08 reveals its assets property. Comparative analysis of statistical experience on measuring R&D among America, Canada and Australia is described, including the definition, treatment of spillovers, organizations and methods. It is of great significance for China that has not implemented capitalization of R&D. Finally, some suggestions have been provided under the current situation in China.

     

/

返回文章
返回