高传胜. 食品药品质量安全事件: 社会共责,还是政府全责? ——包容性发展视角下关于公共治理机制的思考[J]. 电子科技大学学报社科版, 2013, 15(3). DOI: 1008-8105(2013)03-0001-06
引用本文: 高传胜. 食品药品质量安全事件: 社会共责,还是政府全责? ——包容性发展视角下关于公共治理机制的思考[J]. 电子科技大学学报社科版, 2013, 15(3). DOI: 1008-8105(2013)03-0001-06
GAO Chuan-sheng. Safety Events of Food and Drug Quality: Corporate Social Responsibility, or Full Responsibility of the Government? ——On the public governance mechanism in the inclusive development perspective[J]. Journal of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China(SOCIAL SCIENCES EDITION), 2013, 15(3). DOI: 1008-8105(2013)03-0001-06
Citation: GAO Chuan-sheng. Safety Events of Food and Drug Quality: Corporate Social Responsibility, or Full Responsibility of the Government? ——On the public governance mechanism in the inclusive development perspective[J]. Journal of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China(SOCIAL SCIENCES EDITION), 2013, 15(3). DOI: 1008-8105(2013)03-0001-06

食品药品质量安全事件: 社会共责,还是政府全责? ——包容性发展视角下关于公共治理机制的思考

Safety Events of Food and Drug Quality: Corporate Social Responsibility, or Full Responsibility of the Government? ——On the public governance mechanism in the inclusive development perspective

  • 摘要: 食品药品质量安全事件频发再次拷问政府监管职能。在国家发展水平总体较低、社会成员忙于生计而忽视职业道德和社会责任的大环境下,政府部门即便有很强的监管意愿往往也很难全面有效落实。更何况,政府人也是“自利人”。因此,简单认为食品药品质量安全问题是政府全责是有失偏颇的,尽管政府职能确实有待进一步改善。顺应公共管理理论与模式发展的国际趋势,中国必须走公共治理之路,亦即发挥包括政府在内的全体社会成员的共同作用,实现统一规则下的分工协同治理。为此,可以在包容性发展视角下重构公共治理机制,而当前特别需要充分利用全民智慧、提高政府监管有效性,并通过健全激励与约束机制,既调动国民参与治理的积极性,又激发国民的社会责任意识

     

    Abstract: The frequent occurrence of the safety events on food and drug quality cast a question over the regulatory functions of the government once again. Under an atmosphere where social members are busy meeting their own ends while neglecting professional ethics and social responsibility, and where the overall level of development stays comparatively low, government departments cannot implement supervision comprehensively and effectively. Conforming to the international trends of the theory and models of public management, China must take the road of public governance, which means that every social member, including the government, should play a role in the collaborative governance based on division of work, under the common rules. To achieve this goal, the mechanism can be restructured in the perspective of inclusive development. The priority at the moment is to take full advantage of the universal wisdom, improve the effectiveness of government’s supervision and management, and by perfecting the mechanism of incentive and restraint, to mobilize the enthusiasm of citizen participation in governance, as well as stimulate the national awareness of social responsibility

     

/

返回文章
返回