周秀娟, 史雨萱. 数字经济时代个人数据携带的私法规制路径研究——以欧盟GDPR为视角[J]. 电子科技大学学报社科版, 2022, 24(2): 70-77. DOI: 10.14071/j.1008-8105(2021)-4007
引用本文: 周秀娟, 史雨萱. 数字经济时代个人数据携带的私法规制路径研究——以欧盟GDPR为视角[J]. 电子科技大学学报社科版, 2022, 24(2): 70-77. DOI: 10.14071/j.1008-8105(2021)-4007
ZHOU Xiu-juan, SHI Yu-xuan. Research on the Private Law Regulation Path of Personal Data Portability in Digital Economy Era——From the Perspective of EU GDPR[J]. Journal of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China(SOCIAL SCIENCES EDITION), 2022, 24(2): 70-77. DOI: 10.14071/j.1008-8105(2021)-4007
Citation: ZHOU Xiu-juan, SHI Yu-xuan. Research on the Private Law Regulation Path of Personal Data Portability in Digital Economy Era——From the Perspective of EU GDPR[J]. Journal of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China(SOCIAL SCIENCES EDITION), 2022, 24(2): 70-77. DOI: 10.14071/j.1008-8105(2021)-4007

数字经济时代个人数据携带的私法规制路径研究以欧盟GDPR为视角

Research on the Private Law Regulation Path of Personal Data Portability in Digital Economy EraFrom the Perspective of EU GDPR

  • 摘要:
    目的/意义十九届四中全会明确了数据是数字经济时代最重要的生产要素之一。而厘清个人数据携带的私法规制问题,实现在私法制度设计层面对数据权属及携带问题的突破,已然成为对数据合规流通的法律保障研究中的当务之急。
    设计/方法传统规制路径在设置目的上与个人数据携带之理念存有差异,随意适用可能导致个人数据携带的初衷难以实现。故以欧盟法提出的设权化路径为分析基础,并通过对国内学者所提出的《知识产权法》路径、《物权法》路径、《侵权法》路径、《合同法》路径和《人格权法》路径进行辨析,从而对数据携带私法路径进行本土化构建。
    结论/发现建立以《人格权法》规制为基础,以特殊私法限制规则为辅,设置场景分类保护模式的个人数据携带保护制度范式,成为我国个人数据携带私法规制的应有之义,以此达到促进数字经济的发展与个人数据权益保护二者之间的平衡,实现数字经济持续发展的目的。

     

    Abstract: Purpose/Significance The Fourth Plenary Session of the 19th Central Committee has clearly defined data as one of the most important factors of production in the era of digital economy. Clarifying the issue of private law regulation of personal data portability and achieving breakthrough in the design of private law system on the issue of data ownership and portability have become an urgent task in the study of legal protection of data compliance circulation. Design/Methodology The traditional regulation path is different from the concept of personal data portability in terms of purposes, and its arbitrary application may make it difficult to realize the original purpose of personal data portability. Therefore, the EU law proposed path of establishment of rights is used as the basis for analysis, and the domestic scholars proposed paths of Intellectual Property Law, Property Law, Tort Law, Contract Law and Personality Law are analyzed, so as to construct a localized path of private law on data portability. Conclusions/Findings Establishing a paradigm of personal data portability protection system based on the regulation of Personal Rights Law, supplemented by special private law restriction rules, and setting up a scenario classification protection model, has become the proper meaning of China’s personal data portability private law system, so as to achieve balance between the development of the digital economy and the protection of personal data rights and interests, and realize the purpose of sustainable development of the digital economy.

     

/

返回文章
返回