金瑞丰, 杨燚睿, 蒋攀, 任冬林. 创新资源对电力行业数字化水平的影响路径研究[J]. 电子科技大学学报社科版, 2022, 24(5): 53-64. DOI: 10.14071/j.1008-8105(2022)-3019
引用本文: 金瑞丰, 杨燚睿, 蒋攀, 任冬林. 创新资源对电力行业数字化水平的影响路径研究[J]. 电子科技大学学报社科版, 2022, 24(5): 53-64. DOI: 10.14071/j.1008-8105(2022)-3019
JIN Rui-feng, YANG Yi-rui, JIANG Pan, REN Dong-lin. Research on the Impact Path of Innovative Resources on the Digitalization of the Power Industry[J]. Journal of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China(SOCIAL SCIENCES EDITION), 2022, 24(5): 53-64. DOI: 10.14071/j.1008-8105(2022)-3019
Citation: JIN Rui-feng, YANG Yi-rui, JIANG Pan, REN Dong-lin. Research on the Impact Path of Innovative Resources on the Digitalization of the Power Industry[J]. Journal of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China(SOCIAL SCIENCES EDITION), 2022, 24(5): 53-64. DOI: 10.14071/j.1008-8105(2022)-3019

创新资源对电力行业数字化水平的影响路径研究

Research on the Impact Path of Innovative Resources on the Digitalization of the Power Industry

  • 摘要:
    目的/意义 以电力行业2017~2019年69家上市企业面板数据为研究样本,探究创新资源对电力行业数字化水平的影响,为电力行业数字化水平的提升和政府部门相关政策的制定提供理论支撑与决策依据。
    设计/方法 基于动态能力理论、知识溢出理论和人力资本理论等理论,运用模糊集定性比较分析方法(fsQCA),从区域创新环境和企业创新能力两个维度共选取8个条件变量,分析对于电力行业数字化水平的影响。
    结论/发现 存在资源欠缺型、资源互补型、资源均衡型和资源突出型四类影响路径,通过2017和2018年滞后性纵向对比分析发现,前因条件组合下影响路径是动态变化的,资源欠缺型可以发展为资源互补型,资源互补型可以发展为资源均衡型,企业会根据创新资源的不同选择适合的数字化水平提升路径。

     

    Abstract: Purpose/Significance This paper uses the panel data of 69 listed companies in the power industry from 2017 to 2019 as sample to explore the impact of innovative resources on the digitalization of the power industry, and to provide theoretical support and decision-making basis for the improvement of the digitalization of the power industry and the formulation of relevant government policies. Design/Methodology Based on the theory of dynamic capability, knowledge spillover and human capital theory, using fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA), a total of 8 condition variables are selected from the two dimensions of regional innovation environment and enterprise innovation ability to analyze the impact on the digitalization level of the power industry. Conclusions/Findings There are four types of impact paths: resource-deficiency, resource-complementary, resource-balanced, and resource-prominent. Through the longitudinal comparative analysis of the lag in 2017 and 2018, it is found that the impact path changes dynamically under the combination of antecedent conditions, and the resource-deficiency type can be developed into a resource-complementary type, and the resource-complementary type can be developed into a resource-balanced type. Enterprises will choose a suitable digitalization improvement path according to different innovation resources.

     

/

返回文章
返回