人工智能企业政府补贴的国际经济法规制

The International Economic Law Regulation on Government Subsidies for Artificial Intelligence Enterprises

  • 摘要: 人工智能产业的高投入特性促使各国密集出台政府补贴政策,但现有国际规则滞后性引发诸多法律争议,亟须加强国际经济法规制研究。以人工智能企业政府补贴为研究对象,系统分析其国际经济法问题并发现:在规则框架层面,世界贸易组织《补贴与反补贴措施协定》对人工智能基础研究补贴、算力设施资助的定性模糊,且与服务贸易总协定等数字贸易规则存在交叉适用冲突;在实践争议层面,欧美通过《数字欧洲计划》《芯片与科学法案》实施的歧视性补贴条款,与中国人工智能基金的普惠性支持形成博弈,凸显全球产业链碎片化风险。结合欧盟对阿斯麦企业的研发资助审查、中国“东数西算”项目争议等典型案例,提出人工智能企业政府补贴的发展趋势及其规制优化路径:其一,全球人工智能企业政府补贴需在创新激励与贸易公平间寻求平衡,未来规则博弈焦点将集中于基础设施补贴界定与“国家安全例外”适用边界,推动世界贸易组织规则现代化及区域协定协调;其二,我国政府应优化政府补贴结构、强化多边协调与技术标准突破,企业需构建供应链多元化与合规审查机制。

     

    Abstract: The high-investment nature of the artificial intelligence industry has prompted countries to intensively introduce government subsidy policies, yet the lag of existing international rules has triggered numerous legal disputes, making it imperative to strengthen research on the regulation under international economic law. Taking government subsidies for AI enterprises as the research object, this paper systematically analyzes relevant international economic law issues. In terms of the rule framework, the Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures of the World Trade Organization contains ambiguous provisions on the characterization of subsidies for AI basic research and funding for computing infrastructure, and there are conflicts in the cross-application with digital trade rules such as the General Agreement on Trade in Services. In terms of practical disputes, the discriminatory subsidy clauses implemented by Europe and the United States through initiatives like the Digital Europe Programme and the CHIPS and Science Act have formed a game with the inclusive support provided by China’s AI funds, highlighting the risk of global industrial chain fragmentation. Drawing from typical cases such as the EU’s review of R&D funding for ASML, and the disputes surrounding China’s “Eastern Data and Western Computing” project, this paper proposes the development trends of government subsidies for AI enterprises and their regulatory optimization paths. Firstly, global government subsidies for AI enterprises need to strike a balance between innovation incentives and trade fairness. The focus of future rule games will be on the definition of infrastructure subsidies and the boundary of application of the “national security exception”, so as to promote the modernization of World Trade Organization rules and the coordination of regional agreements. Secondly, the Chinese government should optimize the structure of government subsidies, strengthen multilateral coordination, and achieve breakthroughs in technical standards; AI enterprises need to establish diversified supply chain systems and compliance review mechanisms.

     

/

返回文章
返回