创造还是约束 ——海德格尔与艾柯阐释观比较研究

Creative or Constrictive: a Comparative Study on Hermeneutic Ideas between Heidegger and Eco

  • 摘要: 阐释学诞生以来主要沿着两条相反的路径发展:理性主义和非理性主义的阐释路径,导致了阐释的约束性和创造性的“二元对立”。海德格尔与艾柯同为现当代伟大的阐释学家,尽管二者处于不同的历史时期,哲学观基础迥异,但二者皆为消解阐释思想中“二元对立”的关键人物,体现在对阐释的创造性与约束性上有交集之处,即生活世界与文化世界是阐释创造性的根本原因;存在与文本意图体现了阐释的约束性。但是二者的阐释学却均未摆脱神秘主义的影响,未从根本上解决创造与约束的二元对立问题

     

    Abstract: Two schools of Hermeneutics, rational and irrational, have run counter to each other ever since its birth, which has led to two opposing views on interpretation, they are creative and constrictive. As the two most eminent representatives of Hermeneutics, Heidegger and Eco have shared some views on interpretation, to put creation and constriction on equal footing. Life World and Cultural World is the constant source of creative interpretation; existence and textual intention set the limits of interpretation; still, mysticism in their ideas cast shadow on their original intention to eliminate the conflicts between creation and constriction.

     

/

返回文章
返回