| Citation: |
WANG Fang, ZHANG Heng-jie, ZHU Yan, DONG Yu-cheng. Evolutionary Game Analysis of Emission Reduction Cost Sharing in a Dual-Channel Supply Chain Under Carbon Cap Constraints[J]. Journal of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China(SOCIAL SCIENCES EDITION), 2024, 26(3): 75-88. DOI: 10.14071/j.1008-8105(2024)-3001
|
Excessive emission of the greenhouse gas, whose main component is carbon dioxide, has led to the problem of global warming and attracted global attention. Supply chains generate large amounts of carbon dioxide during manufacturing, so there is an urgent need to reduce supply chain carbon emissions. There are mainly two carbon emission reduction strategies: carbon emission reduction technology and carbon trading. Considering the high cost of carbon reduction technology, a manufacturer in dual-channel supply chains tends to share costs with retailer to reduce corporate risks. Therefore, the core issue of supply chain carbon emission reduction is how to encourage manufacturer and retailer to jointly invest in carbon emission reduction technology. This paper studies the emission reduction cost sharing based on evolutionary game, and further analyzes the effect of price regulation mechanism on evolutionary stability strategies. There are three evolutionary stability strategies: (1) manufacturer invests and retailer doesn’t invest, (2) manufacturer doesn’t invest and retailer invests, (3) neither manufacturer or retailer invest. Further more, when introducing price regulation mechanism, the dual-channel supply chain system will stabilize on the strategy that both manufacturer and retailer invest. In addition, the simulation analysis is used to verify the above theoretical results, and analyze the impact of some paraments on manufacturers and retailers sharing the carbon emission reduction technology costs.
| [1] |
FAN X S, CHEN K L, CHEN Y J. Is price commitment a better solution to control carbon emissions and promote technology investment[J]. Management Science, 2023, 69: 325-341. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.2022.4365
|
| [2] |
FENG H R, ZENG Y L, CAI X Q, et al. Altruistic profit allocation rules for joint replenishment with carbon cap-and-trade policy[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2021, 290: 956-967. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2020.08.040
|
| [3] |
淳伟德, 张业霞, 陈威. 碳限额与碳交易机制研究现状及趋势展望[J]. 电子科技大学学报(社科版), 2022, 24(1): 92-104.
|
| [4] |
CHAI Q, XIAO Z, LAI K, et al. Can carbon cap and trade mechanism be beneficial for remanufacturing?[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2018, 203: 311-321. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.07.004
|
| [5] |
陈晓红, 曾祥宇, 王傅强. 碳限额交易机制下碳交易价格对供应链碳排放的影响[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2016, 36(10): 2562-2571.
|
| [6] |
MIRZAEE H, SAMARGHANDI H, WILLOUGHBY K. A robust optimization model for green supplier selection and order allocation in a closed-loop supply chain considering cap-and-trade mechanism[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2023, 228: 120423. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2023.120423
|
| [7] |
李璟, 谢家平, 古丽扎尔·艾赛提. 非对称信息下考虑绿色偏好差异化与碳约束的减排定价策略优化[J/OL]. 中国管理科学: 1-13 [2022-04-13]. https://doi.org/10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2021.1185.
|
| [8] |
杨建华, 解雯倩. 碳限额交易下考虑平台推广服务的竞争制造商减排决策研究[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2022, 42(12): 3305-3318.
|
| [9] |
KORPEOGLU C G, KORPEOGLU E, CHO S H. Supply chain competition: a market game approach[J]. Management Science, 2020, 66(12): 5485-6064. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.2019.3500
|
| [10] |
陈剑, 刘运辉. 数智化使能运营管理变革: 从供应链到供应链生态系统[J]. 管理世界, 2021, 37(11): 227-240+14.
|
| [11] |
李勇建, 陈婷. 区块链赋能供应链: 挑战、实施路径与展望[J]. 南开管理评论, 2021, 24(05): 192-201+212+202-203.
|
| [12] |
余德建, 盛丽博, 李登峰. 基于主路径的闭环供应链领域知识演化研究[J/OL]. 中国管理科学: 1-12 [2022-07-05]. https://doi.org/10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2021.1583.
|
| [13] |
VAN HOEK R, FUGATE B, DAVLETSHIN M, et al. Integrating blockchain into supply chain management: a toolkit for practical implementation[M]. London: Kogan Page, 2019.
|
| [14] |
陈威, 王圣洁, 尚雅茹, 等. 基于地方保护的碳限额与交易机制下电力供应链企业的低碳技术投资研究[J]. 电子科技大学学报(社科版), 2022, 24(5): 73-87.
|
| [15] |
GOPALAKRISHNAN S, GRANOT D, GRANOT F, et al. Incentives and emission responsibility allocation in supply chains[J]. Management Science, 2021, 67(7): 4172-4190. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.2020.3724
|
| [16] |
谢鑫鹏, 赵道致. 低碳供应链企业减排合作策略研究[J]. 管理科学, 2013, 26(3): 108-119.
|
| [17] |
XU X P, ZHANG W, HE P, et al. Production and pricing problems in make-to-order supply chain with cap-and-trade regulation[J]. Omega, 2017, 66: 248-257. doi: 10.1016/j.omega.2015.08.006
|
| [18] |
王文宾, 管婕. 碳限额交易政策下考虑发电商减排策略的电力供应链决策[J/OL]. 中国管理科学: 1-12 [2023-08-23]. https://doi.org/10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2022.1558.
|
| [19] |
JI J N, ZHANG Z Y, YANG L. Carbon emission reduction decisions in the retail-dual-channel supply chain with consumers' preference[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2017, 141: 852-867. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.135
|
| [20] |
TONG W, MU D, ZHAO F, et al. The impact of cap-and-trade mechanism and consumers’ environmental preferences on a retailer-led supply chain[J]. Resources, Conservation & Recycling, 2019, 142: 88-100.
|
| [21] |
王文利, 程天毓. 碳交易背景下供应链运营决策的演化博弈分析[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2021, 41(5): 1272-1281.
|
| [22] |
XIA J, NIU W J. Carbon-reducing contract design for a supply chain with environmental responsibility under asymmetric information[J]. Omega, 2021, 102: 102390. doi: 10.1016/j.omega.2020.102390
|
| [23] |
卓四清, 韩雪. 碳补贴与零售商竞争下供应链合作方式的微分博弈研究[J]. 管理工程学报, 2023, 37(2): 80-89.
|
| [24] |
杨洁, 曾子豪, 吴林炜, 等. 限制交流结构下供应链碳减排策略的非合作-合作两型博弈研究[J/OL]. 系统工程理论与实践: 1-20 [2023-08-17]. https://doi.org/10.12011/SETP2022-2730.
|
| [25] |
刘名武, 林强, 王晓斐. 供应链减排运作决策研究现状与发展趋势[J]. 电子科技大学学报(社科版), 2022, 24(2): 86-95.
|
| [26] |
HU M, XU X L, XUE W L, et al. Demand pooling in omnichannel operations[J]. Management Science, 2022, 68(2): 883-894. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.2021.3964
|
| [27] |
MODAK N M, KELLE P. Managing a dual-channel supply chain under price and delivery-time dependent stochastic demand[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2019, 272: 147-161. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2018.05.067
|
| [28] |
陈俊霖, 王山. 双渠道供应链中紧俏产品升级成本分担演化博弈分析[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(10): 224-235.
|
| [29] |
LI W, CHEN J, LIANG G Q, et al. Money-back guarantee and personalized pricing in a Stackelberg manufacturer's dual-channel supply chain[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2018, 197: 84-98. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.12.027
|
| [30] |
张令荣, 徐航, 李云风. 碳配额交易背景下双渠道供应链减排决策研究[J]. 管理工程学报, 2023, 37(2): 90-98.
|
| [31] |
潘晨, 杨柏, 冯鹤林, 等. 碳交易制度下绿色供应链不同成本分担合同选择[J]. 系统工程学报, 2023, 38(4): 556-576.
|
| [32] |
KAHNEMAN D. A perspective on judgment and choice: mapping bounded rationality[J]. American Psychologist, 2003, 58(9): 697-720. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.58.9.697
|
| [33] |
黄海棠, 李登峰, 蔡创能, 等. 基于三方演化博弈模型的精准扶贫主体行为研究[J]. 电子科技大学学报(社科版), 2020, 22(2): 77-87.
|
| [34] |
FRIEDMAN D. Evolutionary games in economics[J]. Econometrica, 1991, 59(3): 637-666. doi: 10.2307/2938222
|
Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co., Ltd. 
DownLoad: