• Overview of Chinese core journals
  • Chinese Science Citation Database(CSCD)
  • Chinese Scientific and Technological Paper and Citation Database (CSTPCD)
  • China National Knowledge Infrastructure(CNKI)
  • Chinese Science Abstracts Database(CSAD)
  • JST China
  • SCOPUS
HE Li, WANG Yong-yuan, FENG Ke. Does Digital Transformation of Enterprises Help with Regulation?——Empirical Evidence from Breaches of Chinese A-share Listed Companies[J]. Journal of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China(SOCIAL SCIENCES EDITION), 2025, 27(3): 48-63. DOI: 10.14071/j.1008-8105(2024)-3030
Citation: HE Li, WANG Yong-yuan, FENG Ke. Does Digital Transformation of Enterprises Help with Regulation?——Empirical Evidence from Breaches of Chinese A-share Listed Companies[J]. Journal of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China(SOCIAL SCIENCES EDITION), 2025, 27(3): 48-63. DOI: 10.14071/j.1008-8105(2024)-3030

Does Digital Transformation of Enterprises Help with Regulation?——Empirical Evidence from Breaches of Chinese A-share Listed Companies

More Information
  • Received Date: July 09, 2024
  • Available Online: May 12, 2025
  • Comprehensively strengthening capital market regulation is an important element in building financial powerhouse. In recent years, with the accelerated digital transformation of enterprises, the information of listed companies has become increasingly transparent. Can this shift effectively reduce corporate breaches and thus empower capital market regulation? With the acceleration of building financial powerhouse, this topic has attracted extensive attention from both the academia and industry. This paper takes Chinese A-share listed companies as subject and conducts regression tests based on annual data from 2011 to 2022. It is found that there is a significant positive effect of enterprise digital transformation on the breaches of listed companies. Further research finds that while corporate digital transformation can curb a firm’s propensity to breach, it also dramatically increases the likelihood that breaches will be audited by the regulator, and increases the number of breaches notified due to the latter’s ability to play a greater role in uncovering more hidden breaches. Mechanistic analysis suggests that corporate digital transformation affects public company breaches mainly through improving corporate transparency, enhancing equity incentives, and driving investor sentiment. This paper studies capital market regulation from the theoretical perspective of enterprise digital transformation, and the results show that enterprise digital transformation helps to strengthen regulation, compress regulatory vacuum, and then promote the fairness of the capital market.

  • [1]
    张宗新, 朱伟骅. 证券监管、执法效率与投资者保护——基于国际经验的一种实证分析[J]. 财贸经济, 2007(11): 3-8+128.
    [2]
    CHEN G, FIRTH M, GAO D N, et al. Ownership structure, corporate governance, and fraud: evidence from China[J]. Journal of Corporate Finance, 2006, 12(3): 424-448. doi: 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2005.09.002
    [3]
    滕飞, 辛宇, 顾小龙. 产品市场竞争与上市公司违规[J]. 会计研究, 2016(9): 32-40. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-2886.2016.09.005
    [4]
    马德芳, 李良伟, 王梦凯. 数字化转型的治理效应——基于企业信息披露违规的视角[J]. 财经问题研究, 2023(11): 86-100.
    [5]
    陆瑶, 朱玉杰, 胡晓元. 机构投资者持股与上市公司违规行为的实证研究[J]. 南开管理评论, 2012, 15(1): 13-23. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-3448.2012.01.003
    [6]
    何理, 冯科, 陈蓓蓓. 社交媒体网络中心度对上市公司违规的影响[J]. 首都经济贸易大学学报, 2022, 24(5): 88-99.
    [7]
    陈运森, 邓祎璐, 李哲. 证券交易所一线监管的有效性研究: 基于财务报告问询函的证据[J]. 管理世界, 2019, 35(3): 169-185+208.
    [8]
    张克中, 欧阳洁, 李文健. 缘何“减税难降负”: 信息技术、征税能力与企业逃税[J]. 经济研究, 2020, 55(3): 116-132.
    [9]
    孙雪娇, 翟淑萍, 于苏. 大数据税收征管如何影响企业盈余管理?——基于“金税三期”准自然实验的证据[J]. 会计研究, 2021(1): 67-81.
    [10]
    刘慧龙, 张玲玲, 谢婧. 税收征管数字化升级与企业关联交易治理[J]. 管理世界, 2022, 38(6): 158-176.
    [11]
    唐要家, 王钰, 唐春晖. 数字经济、市场结构与创新绩效[J]. 中国工业经济, 2022(10): 62-80.
    [12]
    陈德球, 张雯宇. 企业数字化转型与管理层激励[J]. 经济管理, 2023, 45(5): 132-150.
    [13]
    罗宏, 曾永良, 宛玲羽. 薪酬攀比、盈余管理与高管薪酬操纵[J]. 南开管理评论, 2016, 19(2): 19-31+74.
    [14]
    王化成, 曹丰, 叶康涛. 监督还是掏空: 大股东持股比例与股价崩盘风险[J]. 管理世界, 2015(2): 45-57+187.
    [15]
    王守海, 徐晓彤, 刘烨炜. 企业数字化转型会降低债务违约风险吗?[J]. 证券市场导报, 2022(4): 45-56.
    [16]
    田澍, 林树, 俞乔. 新兴市场环境下机构投资者投资行为——基于中国大陆资本市场的研究[J]. 金融研究, 2012(8): 139-151.
    [17]
    周开国, 应千伟, 钟畅. 媒体监督能够起到外部治理的作用吗?——来自中国上市公司违规的证据[J]. 金融研究, 2016(6): 193-206.
    [18]
    KHANNA V, KIM E H, LU Y. CEO connectedness and corporate fraud[J]. The Journal of Finance, 2015, 70(3): 1203-1252. doi: 10.1111/jofi.12243
    [19]
    吴非, 胡慧芷, 林慧妍, 等. 企业数字化转型与资本市场表现——来自股票流动性的经验证据[J]. 管理世界, 2021, 37(7): 130-144+10.
    [20]
    黄宇虹, 吕玲, 任迎伟, 等. 数字化经营对小微企业生存能力的影响——基于寻租与信息不对称理论[J]. 电子科技大学学报(社科版), 2023, 25(6): 37-47.
    [21]
    张文文, 景维民. 数字经济监管与企业数字化转型——基于收益和成本的权衡分析[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2024, 41(1): 5-24.
    [22]
    甄红线、王玺、方红星. 知识产权行政保护与企业数字化转型[J]. 经济研究, 2023(11): 62-79.
    [23]
    陆瑶, 李茶. CEO对董事会的影响力与上市公司违规犯罪[J]. 金融研究, 2016(1): 176-191
    [24]
    万良勇, 邓路, 郑小玲. 网络位置、独立董事治理与公司违规——基于部分可观测Bivariate Probit模型[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2014, 34(12): 3091-3102.
    [25]
    蔡志岳, 吴世农. 董事会特征影响上市公司违规行为的实证研究[J]. 南开管理评论, 2007(6): 62-68+92.
    [26]
    黄继承, 朱光顺. 绿色发展的中国模式: 政府采购与企业绿色创新[J]. 世界经济, 2023, 46(11): 54-78.
    [27]
    NUNN N, QIAN N. US food aid and civil conflict[J]. American Economic Review, 2014, 104(6): 1630-1666. doi: 10.1257/aer.104.6.1630
    [28]
    江艇. 因果推断经验研究中的中介效应与调节效应[J]. 中国工业经济, 2022(5): 100-120.
    [29]
    辛清泉, 孔东民, 郝颖. 公司透明度与股价波动性[J]. 金融研究, 2014(10): 193-206
    [30]
    冯根福, 赵钰航. 管理者薪酬、在职消费与公司绩效——基于合作博弈的分析视角[J]. 中国工业经济, 2012(6): 147-158.
    [31]
    张宗新, 王海亮. 投资者情绪、主观信念调整与市场波动[J]. 金融研究, 2013(4): 142-155.
    [32]
    杨晓兰, 沈翰彬, 祝宇. 本地偏好、投资者情绪与股票收益率: 来自网络论坛的经验证据[J]. 金融研究, 2016(12): 143-158.
    [33]
    刘珍瑜, 李璇, 刘浩. 季度经营信息披露与审计收费——非财务信息披露监管创新的溢出效应研究[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2024, 46(5): 104-119.
    [34]
    PERESS J. Product market competition, insider trading, and stock market efficiency[J]. The Journal of Finance, 2010, 65(1): 1-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.2009.01522.x

Catalog

    Article views (20) PDF downloads (5) Cited by()

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return